#Opinion: Becoming Australia’s Seventh State? Not in This Lifetime

Every so often, someone throws a political hand-grenade into the public square and waits for the noise. This week it was David Farrar suggesting New Zealand should consider becoming the seventh state of Australia.

It might make for a provocative headline. It might even make for pub-chat banter. But as a serious proposition? It is nonsense.

And it is disappointing that a mainstream publication would elevate what amounts to a nostalgic grievance dressed up as policy analysis.

If someone loves Australia so much, they are more than welcome to head across the Tasman, apply for citizenship, and hand in their New Zealand passport. That’s how sovereignty works. What we don’t do is dissolve an entire nation because one commentator thinks we’d be better off with Canberra calling the shots.

Identity Is Not a Spreadsheet

Reducing the question of nationhood to GDP comparisons, defence spending or economies of scale misses the point entirely.

A nation is not a corporate merger. It is not a franchise opportunity.

New Zealand’s identity  –  flawed, evolving, sometimes messy  –  is ours. It is shaped by Te Tiriti o Waitangi, by Māori culture, by Pacific influence, by migration waves, by our particular geography and history. We are not a subsidiary waiting to be absorbed.

And let’s be clear: absorption is what this would be.

No matter how politely you frame it, New Zealand as an Australian state would mean sovereignty ceded, constitutional independence surrendered, and cultural distinctiveness diluted inside a federation already wrestling with its own identity crises.

Having Lived There, I Know the Difference

I lived in Australia for two decades. I loved it. I built a life there. It’s a country of opportunity, scale and ambition.

But it is also a country still grappling deeply with race relations.

Australia’s history with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples remains raw, unresolved and politically volatile. The failed Voice referendum in 2023 exposed deep fractures. Debates around Indigenous recognition, land rights and systemic inequality are ongoing  –  and often bitter.

In Aotearoa, we are far from perfect. Māori have fought for generations to have our culture recognised, our language revitalised, our Treaty rights upheld. The struggle continues.

But on the global spectrum of Indigenous recognition, New Zealand is significantly ahead.

Te reo Māori is an official language. Te Tiriti shapes jurisprudence. Whānau can challenge the Crown in the Waitangi Tribunal. Māori seats exist in Parliament. Iwi are economic powerhouses.

That didn’t happen by accident. It happened through decades of protest, litigation, negotiation and sacrifice.

Why on earth would we dilute that framework by submerging it inside a federal system where Indigenous recognition remains politically fragile?

Cultural Assimilation Is Not a Neutral Act

Becoming part of Australia would not be a friendly partnership of equals. It would be assimilation.

Our constitutional arrangements, Treaty jurisprudence, and evolving bicultural framework would face immense legal complexity inside the Australian Constitution, which was never designed to accommodate a Treaty-based sovereignty model like ours.

You cannot simply staple Te Tiriti onto Canberra’s rulebook and hope for the best.

The truth is that New Zealand’s identity is distinct because it has been shaped by an ongoing negotiation between Māori and the Crown. That process is unfinished. But it is ours.

The Right’s Perennial Hoha

There is also something predictable about where this idea is coming from.

David Farrar operates on the right of the political spectrum, where deregulation, market efficiency and national alignment with Australia have long been talking points. It is the same ideological corner that often downplays Treaty obligations as inconvenient or over-emphasised.

So perhaps it is no surprise that the idea of dissolving New Zealand into Australia surfaces from that stable.

But it lands with a thud.

Because while columnists may view sovereignty as a policy lever, for Māori  –  and many other New Zealanders  –  it is existential.

A Nation in Its Own Right

New Zealand is not perfect. We argue. We debate. We protest at Waitangi. We challenge each other loudly and publicly.

But we are still a country where Indigenous language revival is celebrated in mainstream media. Where haka are performed on the global stage. Where Treaty debates, while heated, are at least central to national identity.

And let’s be blunt: we are also not a nation where it is considered remotely acceptable to bomb or violently attack peaceful Indigenous gatherings  –  events that have tragically occurred in parts of Australia’s own history.

We have our faults. But our political culture remains comparatively restrained, grounded, and community-centred.

It’s Good to Be Home

When I lived in Australia, I valued its scale and vibrancy. But there is a reason many of us come home.

In Aotearoa, the land of the long white cloud, we know our neighbours. We know our whakapapa. We know the contours of our own political arguments.

We fight  –  yes  –  but we fight as a sovereign nation shaping its own path.

To suggest we casually surrender that because it might be administratively convenient is to misunderstand what nationhood means.

New Zealand is not a spare state waiting to be claimed.

We are Aotearoa.

Disclaimer

RELATED NEWS

#opinion the masterclass of Winston Peters Serial creep & convicted sex offender: Former ACT Party President awaits more time in court #Opinion: Is the Government in a Pickle? Waatea’s Audience Might Be Telling Us Something