Hoiho Protections in Flux as Court Case Concludes

An urgent High Court hearing in Wellington concluded today over measures to protect hoiho from by-catch deaths in commercial set-net fisheries. The hearing – brought by Environmental Law Initiative (ELI) – challenged recent government emergency decisions on set-net closures, arguing they fall short of what the endangered penguins need to survive. Although authorities imposed a…


An urgent High Court hearing in Wellington concluded today over measures to protect hoiho from by-catch deaths in commercial set-net fisheries. The hearing – brought by Environmental Law Initiative (ELI) – challenged recent government emergency decisions on set-net closures, arguing they fall short of what the endangered penguins need to survive.

Although authorities imposed a short-term closure of set-net fishing around the Otago Peninsula, the ban did not extend to all critical hoiho habitats – including areas around the Catlins, North Otago, and Stewart Island / Rakiura. As a result, penguins in those regions remain vulnerable.

Concern about the adequacy of protections intensified when a hoiho was found drowned in a set net near Stewart Island shortly after the partial ban – underscoring that the current measures may simply shift the risk elsewhere.

In a statement released after the hearing, ELI’s senior legal advisor warned that the long-term proposal from Fisheries NZ is deeply flawed and insufficient to safeguard the hoiho.

Key criticisms include:

  • Unacceptably high allowable fatalities: One of the proposed options would allow up to four hoiho deaths per year before triggering “consideration of regulatory response” – a threshold many conservationists say is far too high for a species already on the brink.

  • No mitigation tools exist: The consultation document admits that there are currently no effective mitigation measures to prevent by-catch of hoiho in set nets – yet suggests fishers could develop solutions “towards zero”. ELI rejects this as unrealistic.

  • Large gaps in spatial protection: Crucial areas such as the Catlins and Stewart Island remain unprotected under the proposals -even though they form part of the known hoiho distribution.

ELI argues that rather than a loosely drafted plan, what is required is a zero-by-catch standard and immediate, comprehensive protection across all known hoiho habitats.

The urgency is real: northern-population estimates show dramatic decline. Breeding numbers dropped from hundreds to only 143 nesting pairs.

Marine-conservation experts note that even a single additional death – especially of a breeding adult – can have a disproportionately large impact on recovery prospects, given low chick survival rates and limited juvenile recruitment.

Furthermore, hoiho are not just wildlife – they are part of Aotearoa’s natural heritage, integral to coastal ecosystems, and of significant value to eco-tourism businesses and coastal communities.

With the court case concluded, the ball is back in Fisheries NZ’s court. ELI and other conservation stakeholders expect:

  • A rewritten long-term protection proposal that incorporates zero-bycatch commitments

  • Set-net bans or other effective restrictions across all known hoiho habitats – not just partial protection zones

  • Comprehensive consultation with iwi, conservation organisations, tourism operators, and affected communities before finalising any plan

As one of the world’s rarest penguin species, the hoiho – if not protected decisively – may edge closer to extinction. The coming weeks will show whether management agencies act with the urgency the crisis demands.

Author

  • Radio Waatea is Auckland’s only Māori radio station that provides an extensive bi-lingual broadcast to its listeners. Based at Ngā Whare Waatea marae in Māngere, it is located in the middle of the biggest Māori population in Aotearoa.