February 17, 2026
Teanau Tuiono: Climate Change, Kaitiakitanga and a Bill to Recognise Whales as Legal Persons
As Aotearoa faces intensifying storms, rising seas and increasing pressure on marine ecosystems, Green Party MP Teanau Tuiono is pushing for a fundamental shift in how the law recognises the natural world.
Tuiono, a long-time advocate for Pacific and environmental justice, has introduced a Member’s Bill seeking to recognise whales as legal persons under New Zealand law – a move he says reflects both ecological urgency and Indigenous worldviews.
From his perspective, climate change is not an abstract policy debate but a lived reality for coastal and Pacific communities. Rising ocean temperatures, changing migration patterns and increasing marine pollution are already placing enormous stress on whale populations and wider ocean ecosystems.
Whales are not only biologically significant as keystone species that support ocean health. In many Pacific and Māori traditions, they are regarded as ancestors, navigators and beings with deep spiritual significance. Tuiono argues that existing legal frameworks treat whales primarily as resources to be managed, rather than as living entities deserving intrinsic protection.
Recognising whales as legal persons would mean granting them standing under the law – allowing representatives to advocate for their wellbeing in court, similar to the legal status already granted to Te Urewera and the Whanganui River.
Tuiono sees this as an extension of Aotearoa’s evolving recognition of Indigenous concepts of kaitiakitanga and relational stewardship. He believes the climate crisis demands not just stronger regulation, but a rethinking of humanity’s relationship with the natural world.
Climate change, in his view, is accelerating threats to whales through ocean warming, acidification, shipping traffic and offshore extraction. He argues that incremental policy adjustments are no longer sufficient. Instead, the legal system must embed long-term protection mechanisms that recognise ecological interdependence.
The proposal also connects to broader conversations about environmental justice. Pacific nations, many of which are already facing existential threats from rising seas, have long advocated for stronger global ocean protections. Tuiono positions the bill as aligning Aotearoa with those calls, reinforcing Pacific leadership on climate and marine issues.
Critics question whether legal personhood would materially change conservation outcomes or simply add symbolic weight. Supporters argue that symbolic recognition can drive substantive change, reshaping policy decisions around marine protection, shipping lanes and resource extraction.
For Tuiono, the bill is about future generations. As extreme weather events intensify and biodiversity loss accelerates, he maintains that bold legal innovation is necessary to safeguard ecosystems central to cultural identity and planetary health.
Whether the bill progresses through Parliament remains to be seen. But the conversation it has sparked reflects a deeper tension in climate politics – between managing environmental decline and reimagining the legal foundations of our relationship with the natural world.
As Aotearoa grapples with the realities of a warming planet, Tuiono’s proposal invites a wider question: if rivers can be recognised as living entities under the law, should whales – guardians of the ocean and symbols of Pacific whakapapa – be afforded the same standing?





