Listen Now: 
February 15, 2026
#politics: Public Service Union Wants Review of Law Commission President Appointment
Matthew Tukaki
Posted On February 15, 2026
A major public service union has called for a review of how the next president of New Zealand Law Commission was appointed, raising concerns about transparency and confidence in independent institutions.
The union raising the issue is the Public Service Association, which argues there was no open recruitment process, no selection panel and no competition for the role before the appointment of the new president.
The position of president at the Law Commission carries significant influence in shaping law reform and independent legal advice to government. Established under the Law Commission Act 1985, the body reviews legislation and proposes changes to ensure legal frameworks meet modern needs.
Concerns from the PSA focus on a lack of clarity around how the decision was reached, with the union saying a proper contestable process was not followed and that highly qualified legal experts may have been overlooked. The call for an independent review reflects fears that public confidence in leadership appointments could be undermined without adherence to established best practice.
The Law Commission’s role is to provide critical independent analysis on issues ranging from criminal justice and constitutional law through to human rights protections and regulatory reform. An open appointment process, advocates argue, is crucial for maintaining the Commission’s non-partisan credibility.
The government had previously announced that the Parliamentarian who stepped down to take on the Law Commission presidency will lead the organisation. That appointment decision has prompted the union’s push for review.
The union’s call for scrutiny comes as broader questions are being raised about how senior posts in Crown entities and independent bodies are filled. Supporters of strict appointment processes say transparency and merit-based selection underpin trust in institutions that operate at arm’s length from government.
The review request is now in the hands of officials and ministers who must decide whether an independent investigation into the process will proceed. The outcome could influence how high-level public appointments are conducted in future.
RELATED NEWS
